Home     Impact Union     Impact Product     Review on Right to Equality     Training Course     Chinese Version    
   Impact Council       Scholars Committee       Team Members   
  Impact Union

 Impact Council         
 Scholars Committee 
 Team Members        

  Membership
 
Username
Password
 
  Order the News
 
  Search
 
  Visiters

  Total:       4058715
  Yesterday:   2057

  Links

    中国影响性诉讼电子刊
    中评网
    中国刑事辩护网
    鄂东法律服务网
    法律人才网
    中国政法大学法学院
    哥伦比亚大学公益法中心
    纽约大学公益法中心
    圣地亚哥大学公益法中心
    耶鲁大学法学院公益法
    乔治城大学公益法中心
    芝加哥肯特法学院公益法
    福罗里达州大学公益法
    天普大学公益法
    伊利诺亚大学公益法
    中国法学会
    中国法院网
    蒙大拿大学
    南方周末
    北京大学法学院
    香港大学法学院
    中国法律(香港)
    中国公益诉讼网
    广东公益诉讼网
    广西公益诉讼网
    武汉大学弱者权利保护
    乌特列支大学人权研究所
    武汉大学行政诉讼法网
    北京众泽妇女法律咨询服务中心
    美国自然资源保护委员会
    保护国际基金会
    绿色和平
    胡同人
    中国政法大学公共决策研究中心
    北京志愿者论坛
    中国小动物保护协会
    北京市汇天羽信息咨询中心
    中华环保联合会
    自然之友
    乐施会
    济南市长清绿星之家助残服务中心
    玛丽斯特普国际组织中国代表处
    徐建国律师网
   
   
   

When Chinese censors got through with the new Ang Lee film Lust, Caution, it was less about lust and more about caution.

But the decision to order the excision of seven minutes of explicit and unorthodox sexual activity from the film has prompted some unusually bold challenges to Beijing's film censorship ­system.

Graduate law student Dong Yanbin has drawn widespread local attention by trying to sue a cinema chain and the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (Sarft) for infringing his rights by screening a version of the film with an incomplete plot structure.

"As a consumer, I am just trying to safeguard my civil legal rights," Mr Dong said on Friday.

His attempt has already been rebuffed by Beijing courts twice, but the case highlights dissatisfaction with China's one-size-fits-all film censorship regime.

The system has no age-based ratings, which means any film release is officially suitable for children, while faceless officials have wide discretion to ban or cut titles for a wide range of loosely defined moral, social or political reasons.

Censors have in the past taken offence at such scenes as the killing of Chinese soldiers by Tom Cruise in last year's Mission: Impossible III and the portrayal of a Chinese pirate by Hong Kong star Chow Yun-Fat in the opening minutes of Pirates of the Caribbean III.

Critics say the system undermines the local film industry by making it difficult to come up with compelling content for adult audiences. It also fuels China's booming trade in uncut pirated versions of imported titles such as Lust, Caution that can easily be bought on the street.

Film industry figures have long called for the introduction of a clearer ratings system. Chinese Hollywood star Gong Li, whose steamy scenes with Colin Farrell were among 20 minutes sliced from the China release of last year's Miami Vice, this year appealed for an age-based system to prevent children from being able to see violent films.

Sarft has not ruled out such a system, but has shown little enthusiasm.

The official Xinhua news agency this year said the regulator's approach was based on the view that "films not suitable for children are not suitable for adults, either".

Mr Dong is hardly alone in feeling annoyed.

"Foreigners can watch the full version of Lust, Caution but Chinese can't," complained "Little Wang" in a posting on the popular Sina.com website. "Surely Chinese are not really more childish. Or is there a worry that we can't take this kind of stimulation?"

Mr Dong's lawsuit reflects increasing efforts by critics of China's government to challenge it on points of law.

The law student has also signed a letter to the State Council, China's cabinet, from Zhai Xiaobo, a Peking University law lecturer, that calls for the revision of "inconsistent" film censorship regulations.

Mr Zhai said challenging the legal basis of censorship of film sex scenes could be a good way of pushing politically cautious film officials to consider wider reform of the film management ­system.

"You can't just throw eggs at a rock," Mr Zhai said. "Starting the discussion with this kind of topic is an approach that Sarft can accept."

 

 
   
 

Copyright © 2007   All rights reserved    北京义派律师事务所版权所有   
    首发作品,网络转载请注明,书面转载请联系 
地址:北京市丰台区南三环西路16号搜宝商务中心2号楼1618室 

  电话:010-84608010  传真:010-84608030

京ICP备13015155号-1