Home     Impact Union      Impact Product       Review on Right to Equality      Training Course     Chinese Version    
   Impact Council       Scholars Committee       Team Members   
  Impact Union

 Impact Council         
 Scholars Committee 
 Team Members        

  Membership
 
Username
Password
 
  Order the News
 
  Search
 
  Visiters

  Total:       4250049
  Yesterday:   2212

  Links

    中国影响性诉讼电子刊
    中评网
    中国刑事辩护网
    鄂东法律服务网
    法律人才网
    中国政法大学法学院
    哥伦比亚大学公益法中心
    纽约大学公益法中心
    圣地亚哥大学公益法中心
    耶鲁大学法学院公益法
    乔治城大学公益法中心
    芝加哥肯特法学院公益法
    福罗里达州大学公益法
    天普大学公益法
    伊利诺亚大学公益法
    中国法学会
    中国法院网
    蒙大拿大学
    南方周末
    北京大学法学院
    香港大学法学院
    中国法律(香港)
    中国公益诉讼网
    广东公益诉讼网
    广西公益诉讼网
    武汉大学弱者权利保护
    乌特列支大学人权研究所
    武汉大学行政诉讼法网
    北京众泽妇女法律咨询服务中心
    美国自然资源保护委员会
    保护国际基金会
    绿色和平
    胡同人
    中国政法大学公共决策研究中心
    北京志愿者论坛
    中国小动物保护协会
    北京市汇天羽信息咨询中心
    中华环保联合会
    自然之友
    乐施会
    济南市长清绿星之家助残服务中心
    玛丽斯特普国际组织中国代表处
    徐建国律师网
   
  Dongjian v. Ministry of Health

 

On March 1st 2006, the First Intermediate People’s Court of Beijing accepted and heard the administrative adjudication suit brought by MR.Dong Jian that the Ministry of Health did not reply MR.Dong Jian’s application of establishing “China AiYan Association”. On May 17th 2006 and 25th, the First Intermediate People’s Court of Beijing held a court to hear the case respectively.

 

The prosecutor asked the Court to sentence the defendant to fulfill

its legal duties and to make written decisions concerning whether to approve the establishment of the association or not.

 

The defendant defended that the Ministry of Health had not yet formally accepted the application of MR.Dong Jian, and that the case had exceeded the legitimate time limit for administrative prosecution.

 

During the court trial, both parties argued over whether the case exceeded the time limit for effective period and whether the Ministry of Health had fulfilled its duties. The Court did not make a verdict in the court.

 

The case is very significant in Chinese legislation history. First, it is the first case in which citizens advocated their freedom association through administrative adjudication suit; secondly, it discloses that the double examination-approval system set by the present social groups systems has imposed irrational restriction on citizens’ freedom provided by the Constitution to establish social groups; thirdly, it can be used as a model for legal protection of citizens’ freedom association.   

 
  Relation Article  
   
 
 
   
 

Copyright © 2007   All rights reserved    北京义派律师事务所版权所有   
    首发作品,网络转载请注明,书面转载请联系 
地址:北京市丰台区南三环西路16号搜宝商务中心2号楼1618室 

  电话:010-84608010  传真:010-84608030

京ICP备13015155号-1