Home     Impact Union      Impact Product       Review on Right to Equality      Training Course     Chinese Version    
   Impact Council       Scholars Committee       Team Members   
  Impact Union

 Impact Council         
 Scholars Committee 
 Team Members        

  Membership
 
Username
Password
 
  Order the News
 
  Search
 
  Visiters

  Total:       4250046
  Yesterday:   2212

  Links

    中国影响性诉讼电子刊
    中评网
    中国刑事辩护网
    鄂东法律服务网
    法律人才网
    中国政法大学法学院
    哥伦比亚大学公益法中心
    纽约大学公益法中心
    圣地亚哥大学公益法中心
    耶鲁大学法学院公益法
    乔治城大学公益法中心
    芝加哥肯特法学院公益法
    福罗里达州大学公益法
    天普大学公益法
    伊利诺亚大学公益法
    中国法学会
    中国法院网
    蒙大拿大学
    南方周末
    北京大学法学院
    香港大学法学院
    中国法律(香港)
    中国公益诉讼网
    广东公益诉讼网
    广西公益诉讼网
    武汉大学弱者权利保护
    乌特列支大学人权研究所
    武汉大学行政诉讼法网
    北京众泽妇女法律咨询服务中心
    美国自然资源保护委员会
    保护国际基金会
    绿色和平
    胡同人
    中国政法大学公共决策研究中心
    北京志愿者论坛
    中国小动物保护协会
    北京市汇天羽信息咨询中心
    中华环保联合会
    自然之友
    乐施会
    济南市长清绿星之家助残服务中心
    玛丽斯特普国际组织中国代表处
    徐建国律师网
   
  The No.1 branch of the People’s Procuratorate of Beijing Mumicipatity v. Lv Chunming

 

In the day of  “International Day Against Abuse and Illicit Trafficking”, CCTV News Channel live broadcasted the trial process of “Drug Trafficking Case” for the first time, which can be regarded as the most extensive “public trial and public sentence” of drug trafficking cases in our country. Out of question, the goal of demonstrating our resolution in eliminating drugs and promulgating our achievements in drug elimination through the case has been achieved. However, the influence of the live broadcast is far more than that: television signals had simultaneously demonstrated our legislation vividly to the whole world: in such a typical court trial, though justices’ role was identified in such a way, cross-examination was carried out in such a way, sentence was made in such a way……and the defendant had been sentenced to death, yet there were so many points of doubt: the court allowed policemen to bear witness in the court while turned such important issues as whether there was “inquisition by torture” into doubts and left them to the public; The public prosecutor indict the defendant for drug dealing but no drugs were found out on the spots.

 

At some degree, it was a trial in which sentence was made just according to the witnesses’ testimony, and no witnesses appeared in the court to receive cross-examination except the policemen who were engaged in investigating the case; all of the defendant’s demurrers were not accepted, and no one could get to know about whether there was inquisition by torture, or where drugs had gone.

 
  Relation Article  
   
 
 
   
 

Copyright © 2007   All rights reserved    北京义派律师事务所版权所有   
    首发作品,网络转载请注明,书面转载请联系 
地址:北京市丰台区南三环西路16号搜宝商务中心2号楼1618室 

  电话:010-84608010  传真:010-84608030

京ICP备13015155号-1