Home     Impact Union      Impact Product       Review on Right to Equality      Training Course     Chinese Version    
   Impact Council       Scholars Committee       Team Members   
  Impact Union

 Impact Council         
 Scholars Committee 
 Team Members        

  Membership
 
Username
Password
 
  Order the News
 
  Search
 
  Visiters

  Total:       4058746
  Yesterday:   2057

  Links

    中国影响性诉讼电子刊
    中评网
    中国刑事辩护网
    鄂东法律服务网
    法律人才网
    中国政法大学法学院
    哥伦比亚大学公益法中心
    纽约大学公益法中心
    圣地亚哥大学公益法中心
    耶鲁大学法学院公益法
    乔治城大学公益法中心
    芝加哥肯特法学院公益法
    福罗里达州大学公益法
    天普大学公益法
    伊利诺亚大学公益法
    中国法学会
    中国法院网
    蒙大拿大学
    南方周末
    北京大学法学院
    香港大学法学院
    中国法律(香港)
    中国公益诉讼网
    广东公益诉讼网
    广西公益诉讼网
    武汉大学弱者权利保护
    乌特列支大学人权研究所
    武汉大学行政诉讼法网
    北京众泽妇女法律咨询服务中心
    美国自然资源保护委员会
    保护国际基金会
    绿色和平
    胡同人
    中国政法大学公共决策研究中心
    北京志愿者论坛
    中国小动物保护协会
    北京市汇天羽信息咨询中心
    中华环保联合会
    自然之友
    乐施会
    济南市长清绿星之家助残服务中心
    玛丽斯特普国际组织中国代表处
    徐建国律师网
   
  To Abolish the Administrative Fee on Individually-Owned Business and the Protection on the Market Entities For Their Equal Rights

There are 20 million individual-owned business in China, who are the product of Chinese transformation from planned economy to market economy. They are as whole in the form of family, have minor employers and their registered capital is lower. Therefore they don’t belong to the corporation that was written in the Corporation Law.

 

Other than the ratepaying, the individual-owned business in China have to pay the Administrative Fee to the government.

 

In one way, individual-owned business in China can help to solve the employment problem and they are an important group of tax payers. In anther way, they have to bear plentiful administrative fee that is as much as the tax.   

 

The problems lie in the following:

⑴In China the private enterprises and the stated enterprises don’t pay the Administrative Fee which causes the discrimination between the market bodies

⑵The basis of the administrative fee is The Administration of The Individual-owned business In cities And Countryside which was promulgated on April 5th,1985 by the State Council. This statue has been in effect for 20years and no longer accords with the current social situation. In addition, the fee collection should base on the law but not the statue promulgated by the State Council because of its lower rank. Hence we can say that the collection of Administrative Fee is illegal.

⑶The standard of fee collection is not uniform and that where the fee collected goes is unknown.

 

         More than 50 attend the conference. The attendees include scholars, lawyers, journalists and owners of individual-owned business. They discuss with the central topics including the rationality and validity of the administrative fee, the validity of the bureau of industry and commerce and the necessity of its existence during the conference.

 

Three conclusions are reached during the conference including:

 

              I.         There is no legal basis for the administrative fee. The fee is against the state’s policy. Actually, it is discriminatory treatment to the individual-owned business. It makes a heavy burden on them and results to the difficult situation for the development of the Chinese individual-owned business. The number of the individual-owned business decreased in recent years. It is no good for the development of the market economy and it providing fewer jobs than before. So we suggest abolishing this administrative fee in the nation wide.

 

           II.         The Administrative Bureau of Industry and Commerce is established on the basis of the order issued by the temporary division during the period of planned economy. It is founded without legal basis. Its power from the documents promulgated by itself in other words “self-granted”. The purpose of the establishment is to prevent the earlier society from the market economy and to eliminate the free trade. Nowadays, the bureau still uses the administrative method to intervene in the market supervision. It seriously blocks the development of the market economy. The extreme centralized power causes many cases of corruption. So we suggest abolishing the Administrative Bureau of Industry and Commerce.

 

        III.         Each year, the use of tens of billions money collected as the administrative fee is not clear. Suggest checking up the fee and publishing the report to the public.

 
  Relation Article  
   
 
  impact
2007-6-1
 
   
 

Copyright © 2007   All rights reserved    北京义派律师事务所版权所有   
    首发作品,网络转载请注明,书面转载请联系 
地址:北京市丰台区南三环西路16号搜宝商务中心2号楼1618室 

  电话:010-84608010  传真:010-84608030

京ICP备13015155号-1